This title always reminds me of Almodovar's film, so I wanted another, but I can not think of any, so seeking to expose here is not only bad manners.
So why do you choose? Simply because it is the term used when someone, in our opinion, speaks badly or does not speak or body attitudes also physical or hurting our feelings.
in Almodovar's film shows the plight of children in a Christian boarding school that goes beyond the fiction film and so, poor education is associated with cultural practices of Christian society to inflict punishment, restricting, neutering, excluding abuse and freedoms of human beings.
These cultural practices of our society, mostly Christian, unfortunately, extend beyond the typical boarding as we see in movies, books and news articles, and becomes an event that typically moves to the street, in some countries more than others, or in groups, communities, social sectors and so on.
also said that someone For example do not have good education when you can not write their own language well, does not know basic math operations or have poor diction. All this also relates to the academics. But some say that those who eat with your mouth open making sounds and even speaking, they poke their ears and noses in front of others are poorly educated, but say that these expressions we can to the side of bad manners, in the experience of coexistence that is handled within our society.
When we say bad words, we talk too much without being deaf - failing rather shouted, whistled for the name calling, slapping etc. all this relate to the ways of some manual sold for decades and what we were taught at home.
And Why come all this? One of the things I think here is specifically that I do not think all this talk really rude but practices cultural entrenched for decades in what is called bad manners.
What is wrong then a person being educated or better, a bad education? If we go a bit far - not so much that it reads "we need to think about who or who said what was good and bad manners, and who therefore they were or not. The first image, for us educated in the Western tradition with other cultural nuances, it would be Greece and then what is another vague memory that we have? Christianity and after that there is nothing else.
suppose that in some countries, education is secular, not Christian, or that there are schools that are proposed as such but what if the company is Christian? And it means that we educate ourselves in society and therefore what we are educated, understanding by training, is a social gathering (home, school, city, country, environment) How we can agree, being opposite one from the other ?
There is no agreement and just lay it confused with the Christian and the line that separates one thing from another was invisible. Let the person who is educated in secular and Christian home outside or opposite How can congenial, indeed, be done?
People often criticize much, Christian people often criticize too much about issues that Christianity itself has been unfounded, the issue is I do not know, is like speaking ill of the devil while saying its name. Let even one example.
Machismo
know that sexism is, man as the center of the world should he turn on its axis, excluding, in different ways diversity. What is different is the feminine or woman to be more explicit. You may wonder, what Christianity has to do with machismo, everything. And hopefully it was only Christianity, unfortunately the most influential living religions of our world live, work in relation to man and woman or the feminine and masculine, the same way.
Both Judaism and Islam Christianity and his friend is the man at the center. What is the foundational myth of Christianity? The woman eats (Damn greedy, they would say right?) The forbidden fruit and their fault (there we go wrong already) sent back to the two of the fullness of paradise.
Did you know that in Judaism when women have the rule is thrown into a room (most fans) and can not meet with any man during his term, because it is impure?.
Some Christian I can say that this education we all received, from the beginning we are rude. Then say that there are types of Christians, the church is a corrupt institution, the important thing was what God said. Well, but how? Yes the base is that, how they might have kinds of Christians, if all we have for decades had the same story, with pictures and everything, and that's not counting the sacred book of the same, which is full of allusions to the subject. Could it be that we split from our cultural world and thus no longer an overnight?
And Is it just the institution as such that is worm? But they are the spokesmen of the same, how they might be accepted just like that and to say that what mattered were the words of God for themselves? And if God is a literary character, and if all also know that this book was written by a bunch of people interested in that we had this wonderful Christian good education so we are known on the street when the man screams bitch (think it's the worst insults because it refers to corrupt the purity of women) and the woman screams Don Juan-dog - (the best of compliments because it is in man's conception of race bla bla bla and the more fertile .... Rather ...) And what I say about fucking ? Who do you mean? Feminine man (the worst insults he is like us women, the impure, the cause of the unhappiness of man.) That is rude.
Prostitution
In this palette of impure thoughts, we reached the famous theme of prostitution, known as subject and as a profession, argue that men have made cultural world in which we live. Both of the arguments used by men and many women too, poorly educated, we find that many women enjoy this work and therefore they do .... Do not know why that argument always struck me guilt and validate solution as work-practice because they receive money in return and that Is that what defines a job?
The other is that men's sexuality are very different women then they need female prostitution because they , releasing stored energy and are less violent ...
choosing these two arguments, being more socially distributed, overturning the first and then the second. First, it is that it benefits both the job-if not work, because it is still illegal, dangerous, unhealthy, because there are so many battered women, physically and emotionally humiliated while practitioners, is more popular because its realization by women than men, is it that we do not feel pleasure as well, or we can not feel it in public as they ?
And yes it tells job, why is not legal, safe, healthy, (as is assumed in general to be a job, and many others are not, are supposed to work worthy to be so) Why no good treatment without any kind of humiliation and the word bitch is still an insult?
is because our Christian society, Jewish, Muslim in the marrow to the woman denied the pleasure and has given him, to practice it, the satisfaction to be higher, ie, macho man.
Are not the Muslims who are the first women to be stoned to death for her adultery? Are not the Christians who have lovers well as trophies, as farrowing wives, whores for fun?
Second, in the end, are we or are we not equal as human beings? Why some things for themselves and not others? The man then unleash their energy needs sex with prostitutes to avoid hitting the children when I get home but the woman should wash the dishes for your pleasure or release at this point also we conclude that we definitely deny it since the start of heat up Christian.
And what happens when a woman is sexually free and receives no money for it and is open to one, two, three, four thousand men? Must do so in secret because otherwise it is doomed to public ridicule, that is the dreaded word, bitch. But the man is a Don Juan, a gentleman well educated, so you can have a lot of whores or women-as Self-and be like all a literary character, as a god, praise, admired public square (his mother had never been so proud).
As in Almodovar's film, the priest raping a child in the bushes, the man as a priest and the child as a woman. We will have to reach a truly secular education, we would have to achieve equality between men and women symbols rather than wages or places to sit on the bus. We should get our act together with the omissions, meanings for ourselves and definitely say bye to religion and hello to knowledge.
Text inspired by La puissance d' there , Grasset, 2006 by Michel Onfray
.
